Messages in this thread | | | From | Fredrik Tolf <> | Date | Sun, 7 Mar 2004 14:14:51 +0100 | Subject | Re: IP_TOS setsockopt filters away MinCost |
| |
David S. Miller writes: > On Sun, 7 Mar 2004 06:00:48 +0100 > Fredrik Tolf <fredrik@dolda2000.com> wrote: > > > This didn't make sense to me. Is there some reason behind this, and > > would someone like to explain it to me in that case? I just spent an > > hour trying to debug my program to find it why it didn't want to set > > minimal cost, while the other three TOS options worked. > > Please read the diffserv RFCs for the current meanins of the TOS > bits.
Well, I was thinking that it might be diffserv, but on the next line in that code, it checks the TOS precedence value, so I thought it can't be. Also, it only resets these bits for SOCK_STREAM sockets - it doesn't touch SOCK_DGRAMs. Is diffserv still somehow the reason behind it?
Fredrik Tolf
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |