Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 3 Mar 2004 12:22:16 +0100 | From | Pavel Machek <> | Subject | Re: Code freeze on lite patches and schedule for submission into mainline kernel |
| |
> > > We have two sets of kgdb patches as of now: [core-lite, i386-lite, 8250] > > > and [core, i386, ppc, x86_64, eth]. First set of kgdb patches (lite) is > > > fairly clean. Let's consider it to be a candicate for submission to > > > mainline kernel. > > > > There may be better way to get kgdb into mainline. > > > > AFAICS, mainline already contains kgdb/ppc. Submiting "core-lite, > > ppc-lite, 8250" would then be simply much needed cleanup. We can push > > i386 few days after that. > > ppc.patch removes arch/ppc/kernel/ppc-stub.c and adds a new file kgdb.c I > think that has a greater rejection chance. > > Let's not change the direction now. Some time ago there was another view that > x86_64 would be easier. We have already had sufficient headache because of > split -lite -heavy patches. Let's try to finish that asap.
Okay, you are right. i386 is best tested. Pavel -- When do you have a heart between your knees? [Johanka's followup: and *two* hearts?] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |