lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Mar]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: status of Linux on Alpha?
    Hi Ivan, Hi Måns

    I haven't found the time to look deeper into the problem. All what I can
    say ATM is, it is real and exists!

    Ivan, perhaps you can give me some useful advise how to debug this
    successfully? I think we should begin to try isolating the problem to a
    single part of the kernel.
    Is it possible that we have a deadlock in the VFS part? After a
    while every process that accesses a file will be blocked (already
    described).

    Regards

    Marc

    On Sun, 28 Mar 2004 20:43:08 +0400
    Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru> wrote:

    > On Sun, Mar 28, 2004 at 06:19:10PM +0200, Måns Rullgård wrote:
    > > Well, I'm using both raid and xfs...
    >
    > OK, good to know.
    >
    > > So you're saying that if 2.6.3 is stable, 2.6.4 and later should be
    > > fine too?
    >
    > I haven't tried 2.6.5 yet, but with 2.6.4 couple of my boxes have
    > 16 days uptime and no problems so far.
    >
    > Ivan.
    > -
    > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
    > linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
    >
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:02    [W:0.025 / U:62.600 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site