lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Mar]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: status of Linux on Alpha?
Hi Ivan, Hi Måns

I haven't found the time to look deeper into the problem. All what I can
say ATM is, it is real and exists!

Ivan, perhaps you can give me some useful advise how to debug this
successfully? I think we should begin to try isolating the problem to a
single part of the kernel.
Is it possible that we have a deadlock in the VFS part? After a
while every process that accesses a file will be blocked (already
described).

Regards

Marc

On Sun, 28 Mar 2004 20:43:08 +0400
Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru> wrote:

> On Sun, Mar 28, 2004 at 06:19:10PM +0200, Måns Rullgård wrote:
> > Well, I'm using both raid and xfs...
>
> OK, good to know.
>
> > So you're saying that if 2.6.3 is stable, 2.6.4 and later should be
> > fine too?
>
> I haven't tried 2.6.5 yet, but with 2.6.4 couple of my boxes have
> 16 days uptime and no problems so far.
>
> Ivan.
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
> linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:02    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans