lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Mar]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: 230-objrmap fixes for 2.6.3-mjb2

--On Friday, March 26, 2004 15:25:23 -0800 Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
wrote:

> It would be really, really nice if we could clean this crap up. mmap_sem
> protects the vma tree, i_shared_sem protects the per-address_space vma
> lists and page_table_lock protects the pagetables.
>
> Does this sound like something we can achieve?
>
> (Could page_table_lock then become per-vma?)

The page_table_lock protection includes pgd and pmd. Would they receive
adequate protection with a per-vma lock? Could we come up with some
lockless scheme for managing them? They're pretty much write-once, as it
stands.

Dave McCracken

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:02    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans