Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: Binary-only firmware covered by the GPL? | From | John Hasler <> | Date | Thu, 25 Mar 2004 19:39:33 -0600 |
| |
GOTO Masanori writes: > But think about: why can we distribute assembler only code in linux > kernel?
Was it not written in assembler? If so, there is no problem.
> If they insist this source code is GPL, then I think this code is covered > under GPL at least for this case. If it's GPL, then we can derive the > newer firmware code from this original ql2100_fw.c freely.
I don't follow you. What source code? -- John Hasler john@dhh.gt.org (John Hasler) Dancing Horse Hill Elmwood, WI - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |