lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Mar]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] RCU for low latency (experimental)
    On Thu, Mar 25, 2004 at 05:16:43AM +0530, Dipankar Sarma wrote:
    > On Thu, Mar 25, 2004 at 12:34:30AM +0100, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
    > > On Thu, Mar 25, 2004 at 04:41:45AM +0530, Dipankar Sarma wrote:
    > > > That was not 16 callbacks per tick, it was 16 callbacks in one
    > > > batch of a single softirq. And then I reschedule the RCU tasklet
    > >
    > > sorry so you're already using tasklets in current code? I misunderstood
    > > the current code then.
    >
    > + if (count >= rcumaxbatch) {
    > + RCU_plugticks(cpu) = rcuplugticks;
    > + if (!RCU_plugticks(cpu))
    > + tasklet_hi_schedule(&RCU_tasklet(cpu));
    > + break;
    > + }
    >
    > That does it. Although, the tasklet handler needs to optimized

    yes I've noticed it reading just the above chunk of your patch, I just
    didn't notice there was a tasklet already there ready for use :/.

    thanks.
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:01    [W:0.021 / U:2.376 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site