lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Mar]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: 2.6.3 BUG - can't write DVD-RAM - reported as write-protected
From
Date
On Tue, 2004-03-23 at 16:23, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 23 2004, Olaf Fr?czyk wrote:
> > > You broke it, the first check simply returns the header so .erasable
> > > must be 0 because we cleared the buffer first.
> > >
> > > ===== drivers/cdrom/cdrom.c 1.49 vs edited =====
> > > --- 1.49/drivers/cdrom/cdrom.c Thu Mar 11 13:31:15 2004
> > > +++ edited/drivers/cdrom/cdrom.c Sun Mar 14 12:21:44 2004
> > > @@ -2658,11 +2658,13 @@
> > > /* set up command and get the disc info */
> > > init_cdrom_command(&cgc, di, sizeof(*di), CGC_DATA_READ);
> > > cgc.cmd[0] = GPCMD_READ_DISC_INFO;
> > > - cgc.cmd[8] = cgc.buflen = 2;
> > > - cgc.quiet = 1;
> > > + cgc.cmd[8] = cgc.buflen = 8;
> > > + cgc.quiet = 0;
> > >
> > > - if ((ret = cdo->generic_packet(cdi, &cgc)))
> > > + if ((ret = cdo->generic_packet(cdi, &cgc))) {
> > > + printk("cdrom: read_di failed, %d\n", ret);
> > > return ret;
> > > + }
> > >
> > > /* not all drives have the same disc_info length, so requeue
> > > * packet with the length the drive tells us it can supply
> > > @@ -2673,6 +2675,7 @@
> > > if (cgc.buflen > sizeof(disc_information))
> > > cgc.buflen = sizeof(disc_information);
> > >
> > > + printk("cdrom: re-reading di, len=%d\n", cgc.buflen);
> > > cgc.cmd[8] = cgc.buflen;
> > > return cdo->generic_packet(cdi, &cgc);
> > > }
> > On 2.6.4 with your patch I get:
> > Mar 23 15:46:03 venus kernel: cdrom: read_di failed, -95
>
> Ok, so your drive doesn't support GPCMD_READ_DISC_INFO at all. Probably
> the best bet is simply to allow writable open if cdrom_get_disc_info()
> fails after all, even though I hate doing stuff like that.
>
> ===== drivers/cdrom/cdrom.c 1.50 vs edited =====
> --- 1.50/drivers/cdrom/cdrom.c Tue Mar 16 09:41:01 2004
> +++ edited/drivers/cdrom/cdrom.c Tue Mar 23 16:23:07 2004
> @@ -725,7 +725,7 @@
> disc_information di;
>
> if (cdrom_get_disc_info(cdi, &di))
> - return 0;
> + return -1;
>
> return di.erasable;
> }
> @@ -735,7 +735,16 @@
> */
> static int cdrom_dvdram_open_write(struct cdrom_device_info *cdi)
> {
> - return !cdrom_media_erasable(cdi);
> + int ret = cdrom_media_erasable(cdi);
> +
> + /*
> + * allow writable open if media info read worked and media is
> + * erasable, _or_ if it fails since not all drives support it
> + */
> + if (!ret)
> + return 1;
> +
> + return 0;
> }
>
> static int cdrom_mrw_open_write(struct cdrom_device_info *cdi)
Just to be sure. In 2.4 it was not checked?
Will your patch go in 2.6.5/2.6.6 or I'll have to patch it manually till
end of my life ? :)
Regards,

Olaf

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:01    [W:0.060 / U:0.756 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site