lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Mar]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: Non-Exec stack patches

    On Tue, 23 Mar 2004, Andrew Morton wrote:

    > Now, what should the kernel do if the executable requests
    > EXSTACK_DISABLE_X but the kernel cannot do that? Is it not a bit
    > misleading/dangerous to permit the executable to run anyway?

    it's not really a problem. We already ignore the !X bit on x86.

    Ingo
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:01    [W:0.021 / U:1.228 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site