lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Mar]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Non-Exec stack patches

On Tue, 23 Mar 2004, Andrew Morton wrote:

> Now, what should the kernel do if the executable requests
> EXSTACK_DISABLE_X but the kernel cannot do that? Is it not a bit
> misleading/dangerous to permit the executable to run anyway?

it's not really a problem. We already ignore the !X bit on x86.

Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:01    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans