lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Mar]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [Swsusp-devel] Re: swsusp problems [was Re: Your opinion on the merge?]
    On Wed, 24 Mar 2004, Nigel Cunningham wrote:

    > Wow. That cc list is growing. I'm going to trim it since those guys are
    > subscribed to LKML or swsusp-devel anyway.
    >
    > On Wed, 2004-03-24 at 11:45, Dumitru Ciobarcianu wrote:
    > > Speaking from an swsusp user (not developer) this is the best thing
    > > imho. Some people just love eye candy :)
    >
    > I think it's really important that we have some eye candy. This is going
    > to be one of the most visible parts of the kernel, and for some people,
    > it's going to be the thing they stare at most of the time when they
    > start up/shut down. If we want to help the cause of Linux on the
    > desktop, we want it to look good. As long as its within reasonable
    > bounds, a small increase in kernel size is worth it, in my opinion.

    I'd settle for just having something that worked, in a released kernel.
    the patch load I'm carrying around to make most of the hardware in my vaio
    work is more of a shambling mound than a source of stability and
    goodness...

    > Nigel
    >

    --
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Joel Jaeggli Unix Consulting joelja@darkwing.uoregon.edu
    GPG Key Fingerprint: 5C6E 0104 BAF0 40B0 5BD3 C38B F000 35AB B67F 56B2


    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:01    [W:2.821 / U:0.052 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site