Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 22 Mar 2004 11:41:46 -0500 | From | Mike Waychison <> | Subject | Re: File change notification (enhanced dnotify) |
| |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Rüdiger Klaehn wrote:
| | My original approach assumed that inode numbers were unique, and it | would have worked with hard links. But I think it is much more important | to have a mechanism that works for all file systems than to solve the | problem of hard links. |
Inode numbers are guaranteed to be unique on a given filesystem other than for hard links.. Where is this assumption broken otherwise?
Mike Waychison -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFAXxdJdQs4kOxk3/MRAjdqAKCIJ20IxRgq0PmBcV7IIKITI9FhRQCggZDm IvcRYGtqB5ss+jhoLNIj2So= =J6qR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |