[lkml]   [2004]   [Mar]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] barrier patch set
    On Saturday 20 of March 2004 12:36, Matthias Andree wrote:
    > > Correct answer is: everything is fine, RTFM (man hdparm). ;-)
    > Not everything is fine. hdparm documents -i returns inconsistent data.
    > Most, but _NOT_ _EVERYTHING_ is cached: the multcount is updated, for
    > instance. What is that good for? Mix & Match whatever is convenient?

    I'm aware of this bug - driver shouldn't modify drive->id. Patches are welcomed.

    > Are there systems where -I will not work? If there are none, hdparm 6.0

    It should always work.

    > should be shipped without the -i option.

    Why? It can be sometimes useful for debugging purposes
    and HDIO_GET_IDENTIFY ioctl is not going away in 2.6.x.


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:01    [W:0.047 / U:59.712 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site