lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Mar]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    SubjectRe: idle Athlon with IOAPIC is 10C warmer since 2.6.3-bk1
    Date
    On Saturday 20 March 2004 19:29, Prakash K. Cheemplavam wrote:
    > Len Brown wrote:
    > > On Fri, 2004-03-19 at 14:22, Prakash K. Cheemplavam wrote:
    > >
    > >
    > >>Hmm, I just did a cat /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/power:
    > >>active state: C1
    > >>default state: C1
    > >>bus master activity: 00000000
    > >>states:
    > >> *C1: promotion[--] demotion[--] latency[000]
    > >>usage[00000000]
    > >> C2: <not supported>
    > >> C3: <not supported>
    > >>
    > >>I am currently NOT using APIC mode (nforce2, as well) and using vanilla
    > >>2.6.4. It seems C1 halt state isn't used, which exlains why I am having
    > [snip]
    > >
    > >
    > > Actually I think it is that we don't _count_ C1 usage.
    >
    > Hmm, OK, then I am really puzzled what specifically about mm sources
    > make my idle temps hotter, as I still couldn't properly resolve it what
    > is causing it. I thought ACPI, but no, using APM only does the same (apm
    > only with vanilla is low temp though.)

    Hi Prakash,

    Have you seen this thread, it may be relevant?
    Re: [2.6.4-rc2] bogus semicolon behind if()
    http://linux.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/Kernel/2004-03/4170.html

    I have not looked to see which kern sources besides 2.6.4-rc2 may have it.

    Regards
    Ross.


    >
    > Prakash
    >
    >
    >

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:01    [W:0.027 / U:60.988 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site