Messages in this thread | | | From | Ross Dickson <> | Subject | Re: idle Athlon with IOAPIC is 10C warmer since 2.6.3-bk1 | Date | Sat, 20 Mar 2004 20:19:44 +1000 |
| |
On Saturday 20 March 2004 19:29, Prakash K. Cheemplavam wrote: > Len Brown wrote: > > On Fri, 2004-03-19 at 14:22, Prakash K. Cheemplavam wrote: > > > > > >>Hmm, I just did a cat /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/power: > >>active state: C1 > >>default state: C1 > >>bus master activity: 00000000 > >>states: > >> *C1: promotion[--] demotion[--] latency[000] > >>usage[00000000] > >> C2: <not supported> > >> C3: <not supported> > >> > >>I am currently NOT using APIC mode (nforce2, as well) and using vanilla > >>2.6.4. It seems C1 halt state isn't used, which exlains why I am having > [snip] > > > > > > Actually I think it is that we don't _count_ C1 usage. > > Hmm, OK, then I am really puzzled what specifically about mm sources > make my idle temps hotter, as I still couldn't properly resolve it what > is causing it. I thought ACPI, but no, using APM only does the same (apm > only with vanilla is low temp though.)
Hi Prakash,
Have you seen this thread, it may be relevant? Re: [2.6.4-rc2] bogus semicolon behind if() http://linux.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/Kernel/2004-03/4170.html
I have not looked to see which kern sources besides 2.6.4-rc2 may have it.
Regards Ross.
> > Prakash > > >
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |