Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 20 Mar 2004 07:56:37 -0800 | From | "Martin J. Bligh" <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] anobjrmap 1/6 objrmap |
| |
> I'm working on my code yes, I think my code is finished, I prefer my > design for the various reasons explained in the other emails (you don't > swap so you can't appreciate the benefits, you only have to check that > performs as well as Hugh's code). > > Hugh's and your code is unstable in objrmap, you can find the details in > the email I sent to Hugh, mine is stable (running such simulation for a > few days just fine on 4-way xeon, without my objrmap fixes it live locks > as soon as it hits swap). > > You find my anon_vma in 2.6.5-rc1aa2, it's rock solid, just apply the > whole patch and compare it with your other below results. thanks.
Mmmm, if you have a broken out patch, it'd be preferable. If I were to apply the whole of -mjb, I'll get a damned sight better results than any of them, but that's not really a fair comparison ;-) I'll can at least check it's stable for me that way though.
I did find your broken-out anon-vma patch, but it's against something else, maybe half-way up your tree or something, and I didn't bother trying to fix it ;-)
M.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |