Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 2 Mar 2004 15:11:06 -0700 | From | Tom Rini <> | Subject | Re: [Kgdb-bugreport] [PATCH] Kill kgdb_serial |
| |
On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 02:02:16PM -0800, George Anzinger wrote:
> Tom Rini wrote: > >Hello. The following interdiff kills kgdb_serial in favor of function > >names. This only adds a weak function for kgdb_flush_io, and documents > >when it would need to be provided. > > It looks like you are also dumping any notion of building a kernel that can > choose which method of communication to use for kgdb at run time. Is this > so?
Yes, as this is how Andrew suggested we do it. It becomes quite ugly if you try and allow for any 2 of 3 methods.
-- Tom Rini http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |