Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 18 Mar 2004 20:50:01 +0100 | From | Takashi Iwai <> | Subject | Re: CONFIG_PREEMPT and server workloads |
| |
At Thu, 18 Mar 2004 20:43:45 +0100, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 18, 2004 at 08:20:17PM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote: > > also, the total buffer underrun/overrun problem doesn't happen *so* > > often (except for the heavy i/o load, etc). > > you mean because the disk has not enough bandwidth to read the file, > right? (not scheduler related)
it's just my general opinion judging from the bug reports from ALSA users. the i/o load has more influence than scheduler-senstive loads. i think i can test the "pseudo" interactivity with the latency test program running as a normal user. i'll try it tonight.
Takashi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |