lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Mar]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: CONFIG_PREEMPT and server workloads
    At Thu, 18 Mar 2004 20:43:45 +0100,
    Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
    >
    > On Thu, Mar 18, 2004 at 08:20:17PM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote:
    > > also, the total buffer underrun/overrun problem doesn't happen *so*
    > > often (except for the heavy i/o load, etc).
    >
    > you mean because the disk has not enough bandwidth to read the file,
    > right? (not scheduler related)

    it's just my general opinion judging from the bug reports from ALSA
    users. the i/o load has more influence than scheduler-senstive
    loads. i think i can test the "pseudo" interactivity with the latency
    test program running as a normal user. i'll try it tonight.


    Takashi
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:01    [W:4.396 / U:0.196 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site