lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Mar]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: TLD.rmk.(none) junk in BitKeeper logs where BK_HOST belongs?
On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 07:44:56PM +0100, Matthias Andree wrote:
> whose broken script or BitKeeper installation causes all these annoying
> de.rmk.(none), au.rmk.(none) and all that to be logged instead of the
> real BK_HOST?

I do it purposely. Go read:

http://www.informationcommissioner.gov.uk/

and read through the (flash) bits. Now consider "are email addresses
information which can be used to identify individuals?" The answer is
"yes". Are we storing that in a kind of database? Yes. Therefore,
does this fall under the terms of the Data Protection Act? Yes.

Therefore I myself do not want to store peoples email addresses BK,
thereby avoiding this issue entirely.

> I don't care to know who it is but would the offending system please be
> updated or fixed?

Nope - live with it.

--
Russell King
Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
maintainer of: 2.6 PCMCIA - http://pcmcia.arm.linux.org.uk/
2.6 Serial core
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:01    [W:0.057 / U:0.020 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site