[lkml]   [2004]   [Mar]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [Lse-tech] Re: Hugetlbpages in very large memory machines.......
    On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 12:45:10AM -0600, Ray Bryant wrote:
    > I'd still rather see us do the "allocate on fault" approach with
    > prereservation to maintain the current ENOMEM return code from mmap()
    > for hugepages. Let me work on that and get back to y'all with a patch
    > and see where we can go from there. I'll start by taking a look at
    > all of the arch dependent hugetlbpage.c's and see how common they all
    > are and move the common code up to mm/hugetlbpage.c.
    > (or did WLI's note imply that this is impossible?)

    It would be a mistake to put any pagetable handling functions in the
    core. Things above that level, e.g. callers that don't examine the
    pagetables directly in favor of calling lower-level API's, are fine.

    -- wli
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:01    [W:0.018 / U:8.984 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site