[lkml]   [2004]   [Mar]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [Lse-tech] Re: Hugetlbpages in very large memory machines.......
On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 12:45:10AM -0600, Ray Bryant wrote:
> I'd still rather see us do the "allocate on fault" approach with
> prereservation to maintain the current ENOMEM return code from mmap()
> for hugepages. Let me work on that and get back to y'all with a patch
> and see where we can go from there. I'll start by taking a look at
> all of the arch dependent hugetlbpage.c's and see how common they all
> are and move the common code up to mm/hugetlbpage.c.
> (or did WLI's note imply that this is impossible?)

It would be a mistake to put any pagetable handling functions in the
core. Things above that level, e.g. callers that don't examine the
pagetables directly in favor of calling lower-level API's, are fine.

-- wli
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:01    [W:0.065 / U:0.164 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site