Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 13 Mar 2004 22:37:36 -0800 | From | Andrew Morton <> | Subject | Re: possible kernel bug in signal transit. |
| |
Alex Lyashkov <shadow@psoft.net> wrote: > > __ ______, 14.03.2004, __ 08:09, Andrew Morton __________: > > Alex Lyashkov <shadow@psoft.net> wrote: > > > > > > > Well we can only return one error code. Or are you suggesting that we > > > > should terminate the loop early on error? If so, why? > > > You say me can return _last_ error core. but this function return > > > _first_. > > > > It doesn't matter, really. Other parts of the kernel will generally return > > the first-encountered error because at times it _does_ matter. But here it > > doesn't. > okey. second question. > a really need extra variable instead change conditions in return ?
I think it's clearer that way, don't you? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |