lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Mar]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: possible kernel bug in signal transit.
Alex Lyashkov <shadow@psoft.net> wrote:
>
> __ ______, 14.03.2004, __ 08:09, Andrew Morton __________:
> > Alex Lyashkov <shadow@psoft.net> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Well we can only return one error code. Or are you suggesting that we
> > > > should terminate the loop early on error? If so, why?
> > > You say me can return _last_ error core. but this function return
> > > _first_.
> >
> > It doesn't matter, really. Other parts of the kernel will generally return
> > the first-encountered error because at times it _does_ matter. But here it
> > doesn't.
> okey. second question.
> a really need extra variable instead change conditions in return ?

I think it's clearer that way, don't you?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:01    [W:0.085 / U:0.476 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site