[lkml]   [2004]   [Mar]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: LKM rootkits in 2.6.x wrote:
    > On Thu, 11 Mar 2004 20:16:28 +0100, Christophe Saout said:
    >>Ugh... this sounds ugly. This should be forbidden. I mean, what are
    >>things like EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL for if drivers are allowed to patch
    >>whatever they want?
    > If the binary blob knows enough about the innards to be able to do binary
    > patching, it's a derived work and should be GPL.


    Unless the offset of an unexported symbol relative to an exported one is
    simply a "fact" which therefore can't be copyrighted.

    This sort of thing would probably be unethical, but it might be legal.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:01    [W:0.067 / U:17.388 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site