[lkml]   [2004]   [Mar]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: UID/GID mapping system
On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 08:08:31AM -0600, Jesse Pollard wrote:
> On Wednesday 10 March 2004 17:46, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> > If the client is trusted to mount NFS, then it is also trusted enough not
> > to use the wrong UID. There is no "more" or "less" safe in this regard.
> It is only trusted to not misuse the uids that are mapped for that client. If
> the client DOES misuse the uids, then only those mapped uids will be affected.
> UIDS that are not mapped for that host will be protected.
> It is to ISOLATE the penetration to the host that this is done. The server
> will not and should not extend trust to any uid not authorized to that host.
> This is what the UID/GID maps on the server provide.

You're making an argument that uid mapping on the server could be used
to provide additional security; I agree.

I don't believe you can argue, however, that providing uid mapping on
the client would *decrease* security, unless you believe that mapping
uid's on the client precludes also mapping uid's on the server.

--Bruce Fields
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:01    [W:0.083 / U:5.836 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site