[lkml]   [2004]   [Mar]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: (0 == foo), rather than (foo == 0)
    On Wed, 10 Mar 2004 11:46:40 +0530 Godbole, Amarendra \(GE Consumer & Industrial\) wrote:

    | Hi,
    | While writing code, the assignment operator (=) is many-a-times confused with the comparison operator (==) resulting in very subtle bugs difficult to track. To keep a check on this -- the constant can be written on the LHS rather than the RHS which will result in a compile time error if wrong operator is used.

    Yes, we know.

    | Is this an encouraged practice while writing any code for the kernel ? Or is this choice left to the developer ? I was unable to find any reference to it in the CodingStyle document. I did find some code under drivers/ which used (NULL == foo) and similar constructs.

    I prefer that it be left to each developer.

    | Can this be added to the CodingStyle document ?

    Hopefully not. Some of us think that it's ugly.

    BTW, can you use CR/LF every 70 characters or so, please?

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:01    [W:0.021 / U:1.944 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site