Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 08 Feb 2004 12:21:37 +1100 | From | Nick Piggin <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] Load balancing problem in 2.6.2-mm1 |
| |
Anton Blanchard wrote:
> >Hi, > > >>The current imbalance code rounds up to 1, meaning that we'll often >>see an "imbalance" of 1 even when it's 1 to 0 and just been moved. >>Did you see these results even with Martin's patch to not round up to 1? >> > >Indeed Martins patch does fix the problem: > >cpu user system idle cpu user system idle >cpu0 0 0 100 cpu1 0 0 100 >cpu2 0 0 100 cpu3 0 0 100 >cpu4 0 0 100 cpu5 0 0 100 >cpu6 0 0 100 cpu7 0 0 100 >cpu8 0 0 100 cpu9 0 0 100 >cpu10 0 0 100 cpu11 0 0 100 >cpu12 0 0 100 cpu13 100 0 0 >cpu14 0 0 100 cpu15 0 0 100 > >My current tree has your patch and Martins patch. So far its looking >good. > >
Rick's being the one I sent you?
Does active balancing still work? Ie. get two processes running on the same physical CPU and see if one is migrated away.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |