Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 06 Feb 2004 09:23:56 -0800 | From | Tim Bird <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 2.6.2] Documentation/SubmittingPatches |
| |
> On Thu, 5 Feb 2004 19:45:09 -0800 jw schultz <jw@pegasys.ws> wrote:
> It would be _great_ if the Documentation was more accurate to the > taste of developers/maintainers...
> | > --- linux-2.6.2/Documentation/SubmittingPatches.orig 2004-02-04 22:57:55.818563016 -0800 > | > +++ linux-2.6.2/Documentation/SubmittingPatches 2004-02-04 23:01:28.799185040 -0800 > | > @@ -33,13 +33,15 @@
I thought the preferred method was:
--- linux-2.6.2.orig/Documentation/SubmittingPatches +++ linux-2.6.2/Documentation/SubmittingPatches
In other words, I always thought you should have a whole parallel original tree. This more nicely captures multi-file changes, IMHO, and I've seen this a great deal.
============================= Tim Bird Architecture Group Co-Chair CE Linux Forum Senior Staff Engineer Sony Electronics E-mail: Tim.Bird@am.sony.com =============================
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |