Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | Subject | Re: [ANNOUNCE] udev 016 release | From | Martin Schlemmer <> | Date | Wed, 04 Feb 2004 01:03:33 +0200 |
| |
On Tue, 2004-02-03 at 23:28, Martin Schlemmer wrote: > On Tue, 2004-02-03 at 22:13, Greg KH wrote: > > Except if I miss something major, udevsend and udevd still do not > work: >
Skip that, it does work if SEQNUM is set :P
Anyhow, is it _really_ needed for SEQNUM to be set? What about the attached patch?
Then, order I have not really checked yet, but there are two things that bother me:
1) latency is even higher than before (btw Greg, is there going to be more sysfs/whatever fixes to get udev even faster, or is this the limit?)
2) events gets missing. If you for example use udevsend in the initscript that populate /dev (/udev), the amount of nodes/links created is off with about 10-50 (once about 250) entries.
Thanks,
-- Martin Schlemmer --- udev-016/udevsend.c 2004-02-04 00:55:23.522428312 +0200 +++ udev-016.seqnum/udevsend.c 2004-02-04 00:57:37.898000120 +0200 @@ -149,10 +149,14 @@ seqnum = get_seqnum(); if (seqnum == NULL) { +#if 0 dbg("no seqnum"); goto exit; +#endif + seq = 1; + } else { + seq = atoi(seqnum); } - seq = atoi(seqnum); sock = socket(AF_LOCAL, SOCK_STREAM, 0); if (sock == -1) {[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |