[lkml]   [2004]   [Feb]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Why no interrupt priorities?

On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 05:36:34PM -0800, Grover, Andrew wrote:
> Is the assumption that hardirq handlers are superfast also the reason
> why Linux calls all handlers on a shared interrupt, even if the first
> handler reports it was for its device?

I guess so; and in addition it may avoid future irq's in a NAPI like way :)
Or it's just plain dead silly :)
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:01    [W:0.112 / U:1.844 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site