[lkml]   [2004]   [Feb]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Intel vs AMD x86-64

H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Followup to: <>
> By author: Timothy Miller <>
> In newsgroup:
>>Nakajima, Jun wrote:
>>>No, it's not a problem. Branches with 16-bit operand size are not useful
>>>for compilers.
>> From AMD's documentation, I got the impression that 66H caused near
>>branches to be 32 bits in long mode (default is 64).
>>So, Intel makes it 16 bits, and AMD makes it 32 bits?
>>Either way, I don't see much use for either one.
> Both claims are pretty bogus. Shorter branches are quite nice for
> intraprocedural jumps; it reduces the cache footprint.

I think we were talking about absolute branches when referring to "near
branches". For absolute branches, having a 32-bit address restricts you
to the lower 4G of the address space.

For long mode on AMD64, default operand size for _relative_ branch is 32
bits. I get the impression that the size of the relative branch operand
is handled differently from the "segment default word size".

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:01    [W:0.042 / U:8.968 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site