Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 24 Feb 2004 13:41:07 -0800 | From | Greg KH <> | Subject | Re: [BK PATCH] SCSI update for 2.6.3 |
| |
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 10:15:12AM -0800, Patrick Mansfield wrote: > On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 09:16:29AM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > > > > > Can you print out the sysfs tree this patch creates? > > > > What's that "tape" symlink for? Does it go from the scsi device in > > /sys/devices/... to the class device? Or the other way around? > > > > Other than that question, the patch looks sane to me. > > Current 2.6 kernel default names are of the form: st[0-9]m[0-3][n] > > Current /dev naming is of the form: [n]st[0-9][alm] > > Should the st kernel names be changed to map to current /dev names?
Yes, to make it easier for everyone, they should. Any reason why the kernel names are currently different from what we have in Documentation/devices.txt? I really feel we should follow the standard here :)
thanks,
greg k-h - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |