[lkml]   [2004]   [Feb]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] devpts_fs.h fails with "error: parameter name omitted"
Followup to:  <20040224024942.GG1200@cse.unsw.EDU.AU>
By author: Ian Wienand <>
In newsgroup:
> On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 02:24:24AM +0000, wrote:
> > That part makes sense. Previous one doesn't.
> Is that by convention or is leaving out the parameter name in the
> prototype standardised somewhere?

It's commonly done to make code less macro-sensitive.

Personally I wish that standard C allowed it for definitions as well, rather than
having to type (void)foo; to keep it from complaining about unused parameters.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:01    [W:0.040 / U:2.264 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site