Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 22 Feb 2004 16:09:25 +0100 | From | Herbert Poetzl <> | Subject | Re: Kernel Cross Compiling [update] |
| |
On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 09:07:11AM +0000, Russell King wrote: > On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 04:53:50AM +0100, Herbert Poetzl wrote: > > interesting is that some architectures (arm, chris, v850) > > do not even have an appropriate default config > > For some (eg ARM) one single default config makes zero sense. I've > been debating about removing arch/arm/defconfig for this reason; we > have a whole host of machine default configurations in arch/arm/config > to serve this purpose.
ah, okay, so could you 'suggest' or even 'provide' a config which is somewhat 'representative' for the arm kernel architecture, so that (mostly) platform independant patches could be tested on this arch?
> > linux-2.4.25 > > config dep kernel modules > > > > alpha/alpha: OK OK OK OK > > arm/arm: OK OK FAILED FAILED > > ARM is not expected to build in 2.4 kernels, and probably never will.
okay, so this is a dead end for 2.4, right?
TIA, Herbert
> -- > Russell King > Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ > maintainer of: 2.6 PCMCIA - http://pcmcia.arm.linux.org.uk/ > 2.6 Serial core > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |