Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 23 Feb 2004 14:04:07 +1100 | From | Nick Piggin <> | Subject | Re: 2.6.3-mm3 |
| |
Nick Piggin wrote:
> > Lowmem pagecache vs highmem pagecache should be balanced correctly? > I think it is with your other patches. > > Lowmem pagecache vs slab should be balanced correctly with my patch. > > Therefore highmem vs slab will be balanced correctly. > > Is that a good proof? > >
Well no, because you can construct a similar "proof" for your patch because I assume balancing between zones is a two way operation :P. Actually, lowmem pressure does not assert highmem pressure which is the point where your balancing fails.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |