lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Feb]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Eureka! (was Re: UTF-8 and case-insensitivity)
On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 12:32:55PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Anyway, if we're willing to make some other changes to the VFS layer, we
> could make all of this a bit more efficient by _not_ requiring the actual
> filesystem lookup to take place.
>
> If we had a flag that allowed a dentry to not have a d_inode pointer, but
> still _not_ be considered automatically negative, then we could just make
> a loop that fills the dcache directly from the readdir() data inside the
> kernel, without calling down to the filesystem to look up the inode.
>
> That would save a _lot_ of memory - quite often we'd only need the dentry
> itself.

> So then we could have a dcache that is fully populated, even though the
> actual inode data hasn't been loaded yet.
>
> Comments?

*Ugh*

That will cause all sorts of nastiness for filesystems that _have_
case-insensitive lookups. Remember the crap we had to deal with to avoid
multiple dentries for directory? It will come back, AFAICS.

Another thing I really don't like is that we now get real lookups
on hashed dentry. That potentially changes a lot and can lead to very
interesting results for some filesystems.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:01    [W:0.341 / U:0.168 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site