lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Feb]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: File system performance, hardware performance, ext3, 3ware RAID1, etc.
It is a small loss that the TCQ-support implementation hasn't been stable on
linux so far. I guess mostly due to the great I/O scheduling Linux has (ie
anticipatory scheduler).

Yes, a growing number of IDE disk manufacturers are using native S-ATA
controllers in their disks, and TCQ is one of the core features (ie unique selling
point), as well as being implemented on the more lavish P-ATA controllers.

It's just a shame that there are still issues saturating a bunch of IDE
disks with software RAID in the 2.6 series, but I guess that'll be ironed out in
time...

> Daniel Blueman wrote:
> > many modern IDE disks and
> > controllers also have tagged command queuing, so it is even more of a
> corner case.
>
> Linux doesn't use tagged command queueing, though - the code has been
> disabled for some time. I thought the TCQ stuff was disabled because
> only very few disks supported it and the code wasn't reliable.
>
> Yet you say many modern disks support it?
>
> -- Jamie
>

--
Daniel J Blueman

GMX ProMail (250 MB Mailbox, 50 FreeSMS, Virenschutz, 2,99 EUR/Monat...)
jetzt 3 Monate GRATIS + 3x DER SPIEGEL +++ http://www.gmx.net/derspiegel +++

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:00    [W:0.060 / U:0.096 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site