[lkml]   [2004]   [Feb]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    Patch in this message
    SubjectRe: 2.6.3-rc2-mm1 (dm)
    According to Andrew Morton:
    > +dm-01-export-dm_vcalloc.patch
    > +dm-02-move-to_bytes-to_sectors.patch
    > +dm-03-remove-dm_deferred_io.patch
    > +dm-04-maintain-bio-ordering.patch
    > +dm-05-alloc_dev-error-cleanup.patch
    > +dm-07-dm_table_create-GFP-fix.patch
    > +dm-08-zero-size-target-fix.patch
    > +dm-09-dec_pending-locking-cleanup.patch
    > +dm-10-drop-BIO_SEG_VALID.patch

    The maintain-bio-ordering patch mostly fixes the performance problem
    I was seeing on XFS-over-LVM-on-3ware-raid5. (See my earlier message
    at )

    However there's still one issue:

    I created a LVM volume on /dev/sda2, called /dev/vg0/test. Then
    I created and mounted an XFS partition on /dev/vg0/test. XFS uses
    a 512 byte blocksize by default, but the underlying /dev/sda2
    device had a soft blocksize of 4096 (default after boot is 1024,
    but I had been mucking around with it so it got set to 4096).

    As a result, I couldn't get more than 35 MB/sec write speed out
    of XFS mounted on the LVM device.

    I added this little patch:

    --- drivers/md/dm-table.c.ORIG 2004-02-12 20:49:47.000000000 +0100
    +++ drivers/md/dm-table.c 2004-02-12 20:56:59.000000000 +0100
    @@ -361,7 +361,7 @@
    blkdev_put(bdev, BDEV_RAW);
    else {
    d->bdev = bdev;
    - set_blocksize(bdev, d->bdev->bd_block_size);
    + set_blocksize(bdev, 512);
    return r;
    This forces the underlying device(s) to a soft blocksize of 512. And
    I had my 80 MB/sec write speed back !

    I'm not sure if setting the blocksize of the underlying device
    always to 512 is the right solution. I think that set_blocksize
    for dm devices should also set the size for the underlying devices,
    but that probably means adding an extra hook so that
    set_blocksize can call bdev->bd_disk->fops->set_blocksize(bdev, size).
    Which, in the case of dm, would basically call set_blocksize for the
    underlying devices again.

    Correct ?

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:00    [W:0.023 / U:95.120 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site