[lkml]   [2004]   [Feb]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: printk and long long
    Date (H. Peter Anvin) writes:

    > Followup to: <>
    > By author: Maciej Zenczykowski <>
    > In newsgroup:
    >> On Wed, 11 Feb 2004, vda wrote:
    >> > The character L specifying that a following e, E, f, g, or G
    >> > conversion corresponds to a long double argument, or a following
    >> > d, i, o, u, x, or X conversion corresponds to a long long argument.
    >> > Note that long long is not specified in ANSI C and therefore
    >> > not portable to all architectures.
    >> [ personally I'd say screw the un-portable architectures ;) ]
    >> Long long is here to stay.
    > long long is C99, so it's *definitely* here to say. The conversion specifier
    > is "ll" not "L", however.

    What is the proper way to deal with printing an int64_t when int64_t
    can be either long or long long depending on machine?

    Måns Rullgård

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:00    [W:0.021 / U:4.900 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site