[lkml]   [2004]   [Feb]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [CRYPTO]: Miscompiling sha256.c by gcc 3.2.3 and arch pentium3,4
    Jakub Jelinek wrote:
    > On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 11:14:07AM -0600, Andy Isaacson wrote:
    >>On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 11:35:20AM -0500, James Morris wrote:
    >>>- const u8 padding[64] = { 0x80, };
    >>>+ static u8 padding[64] = { 0x80, };
    >>The RedHat bug suggests 'static const' as the appropriate replacement.
    >>Unfortunately that probably means an extra 64 bytes of text, rather than
    >>the 10 or so bytes of instructions to do the memset and store. Ideally
    >>padding[] would be allocated in BSS rather than text or the stack (and
    >>initialized with { 0x80, } at runtime), but I guess you can't have
    > Or you can use
    > u8 padding[64] = { 0x80 };
    > if you really want to initialize it at runtime and want to work around the
    > compiler bug. It shouldn't be any less efficient than
    > const u8 padding[64] = { 0x80 };
    > since it is used just once, passed to non-inlined function.

    I like this, as it avoids bloating the 64 bytes into the kernel.

    bill davidsen <>
    CTO TMR Associates, Inc
    Doing interesting things with small computers since 1979
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:00    [W:0.031 / U:12.816 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site