lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Dec]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: can you switch between GFP_ATOMIC and GFP_KERNEL?

Oh, that's right.

Stupid me =)

Thanks,
/*********************************/
Michael R. Hines
Grad Student, Florida State
Dept. Computer Science
http://www.cs.fsu.edu/~mhines/
Jusqu'a ce que le futur vienne...
/*********************************/

On Fri, 31 Dec 2004, Roland Dreier wrote:

> Michael> My question is, new sk_buffs are always allocated with
> Michael> GFP_KERNEL and can be swapped out. Is it possible to
> Michael> change the allocation status of already-allocated memory
> Michael> to GFP_ATOMIC on the fly? (i.e. both the slab-cache
> Michael> sk_buff header memory as well as the kmalloc'd data
> Michael> area).
>
> This question is ill-posed -- kernel memory can never be swapped out,
> whether it's allocated with GFP_KERNEL or GFP_ATOMIC. The difference
> between GFP_KERNEL and GFP_ATOMIC is whether the actual allocation can
> sleep, that is:
>
> foo = kmalloc(sizeof foo, GFP_ATOMIC); /* will not sleep */
> foo = kmalloc(sizeof foo, GFP_KERNEL); /* can sleep */
>
> However, whichever gfp flags are used to allocate memory, the memory
> is the same once the allocation is done. Neither kmalloc'ed memory
> nor sk_buffs will ever be swapped.
>
> - Roland
>

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:09    [W:0.073 / U:0.184 seconds]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital Ocean