lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Dec]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH] let fat handle MS_SYNCHRONOUS flag
From
Date
Robert Hardy <rhardy@webcon.ca> writes:

> On Thu, 25 Nov 2004, Colin Leroy wrote:
>> On 25 Nov 2004 at 22h11, OGAWA Hirofumi wrote:
>>>> Thank you for your help. Do I push to Andrew?
>>> I have some patches which conflict with this patch. So, I'll
>>> submit the patches after fixing it.
>> Ok. I suppose you'll handle the vfat one too?
>
> I am very interested in seeing this sync vfat patch committed.
>
> Can you please provide current status on vfat sync support?
>
> Also are there newer patches for the vfat support?

Currently, the many buffers is still not writing synchronously. And I'm
rewriting the update-path for an update dependency and some optimization,
now.

Current patches is here.

[I'm offline from today to January 2 or 3.]

Thanks.
--
OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>

[unhandled content-type:application/octet-stream]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:09    [W:0.115 / U:0.040 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site