lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Dec]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] fix conflicting cpu_idle() declarations
On Mon, Dec 27, 2004 at 07:10:38PM +0300, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> cpu_idle() declared/defined in
> init/main.c: void cpu_idle(void)
> i386/kernel/process.c void cpu_idle(void)
> i386/kernel/smpboot.c: int cpu_idle(void)
> i386/mach-voyager/voyager_smp.c: int cpu_idle(void)
> ppc/kernel/idle.c: int cpu_idle(void)
> ppc/kernel/smp.c: int cpu_idle(void *unused)
> ppc64/kernel/idle.c: int cpu_idle(void)
> ppc64/kernel/smp.c: int cpu_idle(void *unused)
> sparc/kernel/process.c: int cpu_idle(void)
> sparc64/kernel/process.c: int cpu_idle(void)
> sh/kernel/process.c: void cpu_idle(void *unused)
> sh/kernel/smp.c: int cpu_idle(void *unused)
> ia64/kernel/smpboot.c: int cpu_idle(void)
> ia64/kernel/process.c: void cpu_idle(void *unused)

It's remarkable that several arches are internally inconsistent. Anyway,
this will likely be a shoo-in, as it removes more code than it adds. The
mess surrounding cpu_idle() has been aggravating for some time.


-- wli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:09    [W:0.079 / U:0.200 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site