lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Dec]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] fix conflicting cpu_idle() declarations
On Tue, Dec 28, 2004 at 11:55:16AM +0900, Hirokazu Takata wrote:
> I think it is OK for m32r.
> BTW, you moved the definition of cpu_idle() to smp.h.
> It may not be included from arch/*/process.c in some archs.
> Is it OK?

It should be okay to include even on UP-only arches, IIRC it has stubs
for UP versions of various locking primitives etc. used widely
throughout the kernel.


-- wli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:09    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans