lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Dec]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] fix conflicting cpu_idle() declarations
    On Tue, Dec 28, 2004 at 11:55:16AM +0900, Hirokazu Takata wrote:
    > I think it is OK for m32r.
    > BTW, you moved the definition of cpu_idle() to smp.h.
    > It may not be included from arch/*/process.c in some archs.
    > Is it OK?

    It should be okay to include even on UP-only arches, IIRC it has stubs
    for UP versions of various locking primitives etc. used widely
    throughout the kernel.


    -- wli
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:09    [W:0.081 / U:0.208 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site