[lkml]   [2004]   [Dec]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [Coverity] Untrusted user data in kernel
    linux-os wrote:
    > On Fri, 17 Dec 2004, Bill Davidsen wrote:
    >> James Morris wrote:
    >>> On Fri, 17 Dec 2004, Patrick McHardy wrote:
    >>> That's what I meant, you need the capability to do anything bad :-)
    >> Are you saying that processes with capability don't make mistakes?
    >> This isn't a bug related to untrusted users doing privileged
    >> operations, it's a case of using unchecked user data.
    > But isn't there always the possibility of "unchecked user data"?
    > I can, as root, do `cp /dev/zero /dev/mem` and have the most
    > spectacular crask you've evet seen. I can even make my file-
    > systems unrecoverable.

    But the difference between you example (cp /dev/zero /dev/mem) and
    passing unchecked data to the kernel is... you _can_ check the data and
    do something about it if you discover that the data is not valid/within
    a range/whatever even if the user has full permissions.
    No same person would do a 'cp /dev/zero /dev/mem', but passing bad data
    is more likely to happen, badly written userspace configuration tools etc.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:08    [W:0.020 / U:8.352 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site