Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 16 Dec 2004 10:30:58 +0200 | From | "Michael S. Tsirkin" <> | Subject | Re: [discuss] Re: unregister_ioctl32_conversion and modules. ioctl32 revisited. |
| |
Hello! Quoting r. Andrew Morton (akpm@osdl.org) "Re: [discuss] Re: unregister_ioctl32_conversion and modules. ioctl32 revisited.": > Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de> wrote: > > > > I think Michael's patch is best (but I'm probably biased) because it addresses > > the independent problem of a race in unregister_ioctl32_conversion() too > > (and some other smaller issues in ioctl 32bit emulation) > > They should be separate patches. > > > Andrew, could we replace unlocked_ioctl.patch with Michael's patch? > > Where would one locate Michael's patch?
Here it is for review (against 2.6.10-rc3) http://lkml.org/lkml/2004/12/15/62 I plan to incorporate Arnd Bergmann's comments and repost later today.
MST - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |