lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Dec]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: arch/xen is a bad idea
Hi!

> > > Stunned silence I guess - merging an architecture is
> > > usually much more controversial ;)
> >
> > In my opinion it's still an extremly bad idea to have arch/xen
> > an own architecture. It will cause a lot of work long term
> > to maintain it, especially when it gets x86-64 support too.
> > It would be much better to just merge it with i386/x86-64.
>
> Andi, I totally agree that merging into i386 could be a long term
> goal. However, its just not feasible right now. The changes
> required are way too intrusive. We put considerable effort into
> investigating this approach, but came to the conclusion that with
> the current structure of arch i386 it was going to be way too
> messy.

BTW if you merge xen as separate architecture, it will be *very* hard
to merge it back to i386. That patch would be huge, and would need to
go in "atomically".

Pavel
--
People were complaining that M$ turns users into beta-testers...
...jr ghea gurz vagb qrirybcref, naq gurl frrz gb yvxr vg gung jnl!
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:08    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans