[lkml]   [2004]   [Dec]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: dynamic-hz
    Andrea Arcangeli <> wrote:
    > The patch only does HZ at dynamic time. But of course it's absolutely
    > trivial to define it at compile time, it's probably a 3 liner on top of
    > my current patch ;). However personally I don't think the three liner
    > will worth the few seconds more spent configuring the kernel ;).

    We still have 1000-odd places which do things like


    which will now involve a runtime divide. The propagation of msleep() and
    ssleep() will reduce that a bit, but not much.

    It's so simple to turn all those into compile-time divides that we may as
    well do it.
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:08    [W:0.018 / U:7.540 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site