[lkml]   [2004]   [Dec]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: dynamic-hz
On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 17:12:07 +0100, Pavel Machek <> wrote:
> HI!
> > > I'm not sure what the above "scedule_timeout(HZ/10)" is supposed to
> > > do, but the parameter it gets in 1000hz is "100" so I assume this
> > > is because we want to wait for 100ms, and in 1000hz that equals
> > > 100 cycles. Correct?
> >
> > `schedule_timeout(HZ/x)' lets it wait for 1/x'th second.
> ...small problem is that for HZ lower than x it does not wait at all
> :-(.

Ah ha! Another reason to use msleep() or msleep_interruptible() :).
Or, if you just want to give up the CPU, use schedule(); or if, giving
up the CPU for a long time, use yield() [the current semantic
interpretation of yield()].

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:08    [W:0.142 / U:4.096 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site