[lkml]   [2004]   [Dec]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: cifs large write performance improvements to Samba
cliff white wrote:

>> On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 10:56:45 -0600
>> Steve French <> wrote:
>> If only someone could roll all of the key fs tests into a set of
>> scripts which could generate one regularly updated set of test status
>> chart ... one for each of XFS, JFS, ext3, Reiser3, CIFS (against
>> various servers, Samba version etc), NFSv2, NFSv3, NFSv4 (against
>> various servers), AFS but that would be a lot of work (not to run)
>> but the first time writing/setup of the scripts to launch the tests
>> in the right order since some failures may be expected (at least for
>> the network filesystems) due to hard to implement features (missing
>> fcntls, dnotify, get/setlease, differences in byte range lock
>> semantics, lack of flock etc.) and also since the most sensible NFS,
>> AFS and CIFS tests would involve more than one client (to test
>> caching/oplock/token management semantics better) but no such fs
>> tests AFAIK exist for Linux.
>> We ( OSDL ) would be very interested in this sort of testing. We have
>> some fs tests
>> wrappered currently
>> cliffw
The other thing I forgot to mention ... we used to have a concept of
"performance regression testing" (to make sure that we had not gotten a
lot slower on the latest rc) - not just runs on every release candidate
of a few complex benchmark tests (like SpecWeb or Netbench or some
enterprise Java perf test) but the idea was to run on every rc an fs
microbenchmark (more like iozone) to ensure that we did not have some
small functional problem in an fs or mm subsystem was causing big,
noticeable degradation in performance (large read or small read or large
write or small write, random or sequential etc.). I have not seen anyone
doing that on Linux in an automated fashion (e.g running iozone
automated every time a new 2.6.x.rc on a half a dozen of the fs - simply
to verify that things had not gotten drastically worse on a particular
fs due to a bug or sideffect of a global VFS change).

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:08    [W:0.061 / U:10.232 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site