[lkml]   [2004]   [Dec]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: IO Priorities
On Mon, Dec 13 2004, Jeff Sipek wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 13, 2004 at 03:38:10PM +0100, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 13 2004, Jeff Sipek wrote:
> > > Hello all,
> > > About a week ago, I said I would try to implement IO priorities.
> > > I tried. I got the whole thing done, but there is one major problem - it
> >
> > I did too, did you see my patch?
> I did after I sent mine. I was reading it and I noticed:
> "Disable TCQ in the hardware/driver by default. Can be changed (as
> always) with the max_depth setting. If you do that, don't expect
> fairness or priorities to work as well."
> Would this cause my problem?

Only if you test on SCSI with TCQ enabled. But I already outlined what
your problems are even if you did.

> > Additionally, you don't do anything with the priorities internally.
> Sure I do, I multiply the slice by cfq_prio_scale[ioprio]. It did seem
> too simple. :-) Looking at your code right now, I kind of see some code
> that should have been in my implementation as well. Back to coding...
> :-)

If you would base changes on what I already did with CFQ, that would be
handy. You need the CFQ bits anyways.

Updated patch here:

Jens Axboe

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:08    [W:0.037 / U:7.488 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site