Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Fri, 10 Dec 2004 10:00:31 -0800 | | From | William Lee Irwin III <> | | Subject | Re: [PATCH] oom killer (Core) |
| |
On Fri, Dec 10, 2004 at 09:43:36AM -0800, William Lee Irwin III wrote: >> Well, the only way I see this happening is the process exiting followed >> by use_mm() on init_mm for unobvious reasons (perhaps reasons not in >> the tree).
On Fri, Dec 10, 2004 at 06:55:04PM +0100, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > I don't see the problem with use_mm. use_mm has either the mm set to > ctx->mm or to NULL, and ctx->mm is set to the mm of the process calling > io_setup. > The only thing using init_mm is the idle task/swapper as far as I can > tell, kernel threads and exiting tasks have a NULL mm.
Yet those don't appear in the tasklist, so some task in the tasklist has to get ->mm set to &init_mm. The notion above was that the init_mm check was to handle some out-of-tree attempt to do aio from kernel threads.
-- wli - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |