lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Dec]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: page fault scalability patch V12 [0/7]: Overview and performance tests
    On Fri, 10 Dec 2004, Andrew Morton wrote:
    > Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> wrote:
    > >
    > > > > (I do wonder why do_anonymous_page calls mark_page_accessed as well as
    > > > > lru_cache_add_active. The other instances of lru_cache_add_active for
    > > > > an anonymous page don't mark_page_accessed i.e. SetPageReferenced too,
    > > > > why here? But that's nothing new with your patch, and although you've
    > > > > reordered the calls, the final page state is the same as before.)
    >
    > The point is a good one - I guess that code is a holdover from earlier
    > implementations.
    >
    > This is equivalent, no?

    Yes, it is equivalent to use SetPageReferenced(page) there instead.
    But why is do_anonymous_page adding anything to lru_cache_add_active,
    when its other callers leave it at that? What's special about the
    do_anonymous_page case?

    Hugh

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:08    [W:4.150 / U:0.312 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site