lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Nov]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    SubjectRE: GPL Violation of 'sveasoft' with GPL Linux Kernel/Busybox +code
    Date

    > David Schwartz wrote:
    >
    > > They don't stop you, they just restrict you.
    >
    > They restrict you from getting new updates, they don't restrict you from
    > distributing.

    Umm, they restrict you from distributing. You don't get new updates if you
    distribute.

    If I say to my son, "if you hang out with people I don't like, I won't let
    you use the car". This is a restriction on his hanging out with who he likes
    and his using the car. If I promised not to put any further restrictions on
    *either* his hanging out with who he like *or* his using the car, I'd be
    violating my promise by the restriction.

    > The GPL says, "You may not impose any further restrictions on the
    > recipients'
    > exercise of the rights granted herein." Note the "granted
    > herein" part. They
    > can put all kinds of other restrictions on anything else, as long
    > as they don't
    > keep you from excercising your rights to modify and/or
    > redistribute the code
    > released under the GPL.

    Exactly. But by conditioning the receipt of updates on failure to
    distribute, they restrict distribution. (They also restrict the distribution
    of updates, of course.) Any restriction of the form "If X, then Y" restricts
    both X and Y.

    I can't imagine what would constitute an "additional restriction" if this
    isn't one.

    > > Look, this really is simple. When the GPL talks about "additional
    > > restrictions", it doesn't mean the restrictions found in the
    > > GPL. It means
    > > restrictions found elsewhere, such as in private contracts. (Where else
    > > would the restrictions be?!)

    > I believe you have misunderstood the GPL. They only disallow further
    > restrictions on the rights that the GPL grants. They don't say
    > anything about
    > other contracts or obligations.

    Yes, they do. The whole point of the "additional restrictions" clause is to
    *prohibit* other contracts or obligations that act to restrict your ability
    to exercise the rights under the GPL.

    If not to prevent other contracts or obligations that act as restrictions,
    what purpose does the GPL "additional restriction" clause serve?!

    DS


    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:07    [W:4.762 / U:0.076 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site