Messages in this thread |  | | Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/4] Return better error codes from vfat_valid_longname() | | From | OGAWA Hirofumi <> | | Date | Wed, 10 Nov 2004 02:35:00 +0900 |
| |
Rene Scharfe <rene.scharfe@lsrfire.ath.cx> writes:
> At least ENAMETOOLONG and ENOENT are properly defined error codes. :)
Ah, yes. IIRC I already fixed the ENOENT case. We shouldn't need "len == 0" check, right?
> Anyway, what do you think about the following patch? I just replaced > EACCES by EINVAL.
Looks good. -- OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp> - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |